CCWBE 报告

组织:
城市经济发展中心 (CUED)
报告期:
May 2024
提交日期:
6 月 10, 2024
由...所提交:
Hub Reporting

TA 提供商:一般问题

CWB 目标

请简要介绍一下上一报告期内您提议的 CWB 目标的进展情况:

- Conducted 17 research interviews with Phase I grantees for 'State of the Chicago Cooperative Ecosystem' final report as a CWB deliverable. - Deepened Communications strategy for Chicago CWB and CCWBE - Hosted 1 working group meeting with 24 participants (other WGs are on a cadence that didn't fall into this month) - Hosted one three-hour, hybrid TA strategy session specifically for Limited Equity Housing Cooperatives - Met with Phase II Pre-Development grantees one-on-one to work through reporting platform as needed - Met in-person three times with local housing cooperative stakeholders, all of which included Peter Dean from UHAB who was in town for grant work - Continued strategy and implementation of formal knowledge transfer to Chicago entities as well as local cooperative mapping to support with UHAB grant work and ongoing state Cooperative Housing Task Force - Liaised between DOH and community members about the importance of including group/zero equity cooperatives in policy. Produced 11-paged document for their consideration. - Participated in DAWI worker-cooperative cohort for 3 hours. - Coordinated with local worker cooperative agenda efforts for USFWC conference happening in Chicago this fall - Continued public education campaign through social channels and video creation - In continued conversation with Cook County Treasurer office about taxpayer address data for individual Chicago parcels as part of our research

在上一报告期内,您遇到了哪些制约或限制(如果有)?

不适用

在上一报告期内,您利用了哪些机会(如果有)?

不适用

芝加哥 CWB 生态系统

您在上一报告期内是否建立了新的 CWB 关系/伙伴关系?

请描述您与 CWB 工作建立的关系。

在上一报告期内您是否与其他 TA 提供商合作?

是的

您与哪家 TA 提供商合作?

CCLF, Community Desk Chicago, UHAB, DAWI, CRN, CSO, Co-op Ed Center

请分享您代表谁/哪些项目与上述 TA 提供商进行了合作:

All grantees and working group members that we collectively support and strategize with.

您参加了上个月的工作组会议吗?

是的

您如何评价上个月工作组对您项目的实用性?(以 1-5 为标准)

5 extremely useful

可选空间

人口统计数据

社区区域(选择所有适用的选项)

社区区 此社区区域服务的参与者
东加菲猫公园 1

 

参与者的种族/民族(选择所有适用的选项)

黑色的
拉丁语
Asian
白色的

 

参与者的性别认同(选择所有适用的选项)

女性
男性
Nonbinary

 

参与者的年龄范围(选择所有适用的选项)

18 to 24
35 至 49
25 至 34
50 至 64
65 岁以上

 

工人合作社工作

本报告期内,您为工人合作社、转化组织或合作社开发商进行了多少次一对一咨询?(例如,一个团体或个人与一个培训提供商)?

0

 

本报告期内,您为工人合作社、转换社或合作社开发商举办了多少次小组研讨会?(例如会议、研讨会、活动等)

1

 

本报告期内,您为 CWB 前期开发工人合作社、转换社或合作社开发商提供了多少小时的支持?

5

 

本报告期内,您为现有工人合作社、转化组织或合作社开发商提供了多少小时的支持?

3

 

上一报告期您发展了多少家合作企业?(答 0 也可以)

0

 

上一报告期总共创造了多少个就业岗位?(答案为 0 也可以)

0

 

请列出您在本报告期与之合作的工人合作社、转化组织或合作开发者组织。

Cocina Compartida de Trabajadores Cooperativistas (CCTC)
革命研究所
芝加哥街头小贩协会
新时代Windows合作社
变革治疗合作社
奇鲜厨房
合作拉辛
街角商店合作社
加菲猫公园社区委员会
HAZ合作工作室

 

本报告期,您向工人合作社、改建企业或合作社开发商提供了哪些类型的技术援助?请选择所有适用的选项。

 

本报告期内您是否为任何工人合作社、转化组织或合作社开发商提供过教育?

 

您的 WC 客户/合作伙伴在本报告期内表达的最大需求是什么?

Clarity and good-faith partnership inside of the City contracting process. Particularly with Phase II projects there has been extreme frustration with the process, and even with local folks with decades of City contracting experience and national folks well-versed in these processes.

 

芝加哥 CWB 生态系统在服务或资源方面最大的差距是什么?

LWCA funding and organizational capacity funds more broadly

 

请分享来自工人合作社、转换社或合作社开发商客户的直接评价,或者讲述您这段时间的工作产生的影响:

 

请上传 WC 研讨会或举办的活动的媒体(带有推荐、照片或视频链接的文档)。

 

Limited Equity Housing Coops Work

How many sessions of one-on-one consulting to Limited Equity Housing Cooperatives (LEHCs) did you conduct this reporting period? (e.g. one group or individual with one training provider)?

3

 

How many group workshops for Limited Equity Housing Cooperatives did you conduct this reporting period? (e.g. convenings, workshops, events, etc.) 

2

 

How many hours of support to CWB Pre-Development Limited Equity Housing Cooperatives did you provide this reporting period?

5

 

How many hours of support to existing Limited Equity Housing Cooperatives did you provide this reporting period?

3

 

Please list the LEHCs you worked with this reporting period.

第五城市公共区:保护经济适用房
Pilsen Housing Cooperative (PIHCO) - Morgan Street Campus
Pilsen Housing Cooperative (PIHCO) - 18th & Peoria
洛根广场合作社
拉维利塔住房合作社
快速启动住房合作社
圣约社区住房合作社
艺术家设计未来

 

What type(s) of Technical Assistance did you provide to LEHCs this reporting period? Select all that apply.

 

Number of AFFORDABLE housing units preserved or developed this period

0

 

Number of AFFORDABLE housing units added to the pipeline this period

0

 

Did you provide education to any LEHCs this reporting period?

 

What are the greatest needs that your LEHC clients/partners expressed in this reporting period?

Clarity and good-faith partnership inside of the City contracting process. Particularly with Phase II projects there has been extreme frustration with the process, and even with local folks with decades of City contracting experience and national folks well-versed in these processes.

 

芝加哥 CWB 生态系统在服务或资源方面最大的差距是什么?

CHA voucher compatibility confusion, and first-time homebuyer assistance being explicitly available for cooperatives

 

Please share any direct testimonials from LEHC clients or storytelling about the impact of your work this period:

 

Please upload media (document with testimonials, photos, or video links) from LEHC workshops or events held.

 

Community Land Trusts Work

How many sessions of one-on-one consulting to Community Land Trusts (CLTs) did you conduct this reporting period? (e.g. one group or individual with one training provider)?

 

How many group workshops for CLTs did you conduct this reporting period? (e.g. convenings, workshops, events, etc.) 

 

How many hours of support to CWB Pre-Development Community Land Trusts did you provide this reporting period?

 

How many hours of support to existing Community Land Trusts did you provide this reporting period?

 

Please list the CLTs you worked with this reporting period.

 

What type(s) of Technical Assistance did you provide to CLTs this reporting period? Select all that apply.

 

Number of AFFORDABLE housing units preserved or developed this period

 

Number of AFFORDABLE housing units added to the pipeline this period

 

Did you provide education to any CLTs this reporting period?

 

What are the greatest needs that your CLT clients/partners expressed in this reporting period?

Clarity and good-faith partnership inside of the City contracting process. Particularly with Phase II projects there has been extreme frustration with the process, and even with local folks with decades of City contracting experience and national folks well-versed in these processes.

 

芝加哥 CWB 生态系统在服务或资源方面最大的差距是什么?

Nonrestricted capital, CLT manager

 

Please share any direct testimonials from CLT clients or storytelling about the impact of your work this period:

 

Please upload media (document with testimonials, photos, or video links) from CLT workshops or events held.

 

Community Investment Vehicles Work

How many sessions of one-on-one consulting to Community Investment Vehicles (CIVs) did you conduct this reporting period? (e.g. one group or individual with one training provider)?

0

 

How many group workshops for Community Investment Vehicles (CIVs) did you conduct this reporting period? (e.g. convenings, workshops, events, etc.) 

1

 

How many hours of support to CWB Pre-Development Community Investment Vehicles did you provide this reporting period?

3

 

How many hours of support to existing Community Investment Vehicles did you provide this reporting period?

0

 

上一报告期您发展了多少家合作企业?(答 0 也可以)

0

 

How many total owners / founders were there in these businesses?

0

 

上一报告期总共创造了多少个就业岗位?(答案为 0 也可以)

0

 

Please list the Community Investment Vehicles you worked with this reporting period.

EG伍德
恩格尔伍德社区投资工具
从空缺到活力:华盛顿公园社区投资工具
西南
We The People 社区投资工具
家政

 

What type(s) of Technical Assistance did you provide to Community Investment Vehicles this reporting period? Select all that apply.

 

Did you provide education to any Community Investment Vehicles this reporting period?

 

What are the greatest needs that your Community Investment Vehicle clients/partners expressed in this reporting period?

Clarity and good-faith partnership inside of the City contracting process. Particularly with Phase II projects there has been extreme frustration with the process, and even with local folks with decades of City contracting experience and national folks well-versed in these processes.

 

芝加哥 CWB 生态系统在服务或资源方面最大的差距是什么?

City collaboration for property acquisition, and for non-equitable liens and fines in distressed communities - particularly those that the City has had a historic hand in disenfranchising.

 

Please share any direct testimonials from Community Investment Vehicle clients or storytelling about the impact of your work this period:

 

Please upload media (document with testimonials, photos, or video links) from Community Investment Vehicle workshops or events held.

 

额外的助教支持

贵组织在本报告期内是否提供了之前选项卡中未涵盖的任何额外 TA 支持?

是的

 

请描述您支持的组织类型(例如非营利组织、商业服务组织等)

We worked with all of our ongoing community partners, cooperatives, and fellow TA providers. Did not include their count in the report as we are only to report new clients, but we regularly work with over 100 people monthly.

 

您总共支持了多少个组织或实体(前面的标签中未涵盖)?

50

 

您为这些组织提供了总共多少小时的支持?

30

 

请分享您为这些组织提供支持的任何其他相关详细信息: